Breast Cancer Alliance

99%

Impact & Measurement

Accountability & Finance

Culture & Community

Leadership & Adaptability

Breast Cancer Alliance

Favorite

Is this your nonprofit?

501(c)(3) organization

Donations are tax-deductible

http://breastcanceralliance.org

48 Maple Avenue

Greenwich CT 06830

203-861-0014

Greenwich CT | IRS ruling year: 1998 | EIN: 06-1453500

An EIN is a unique nine-digit number that identifies a business for tax purposes.

Organization Mission

The mission of the Breast Cancer Alliance is to improve survival rates and quality of life for those impacted by breast cancer through better prevention, early detec ... (More)

Rating Information

Great

This charity's score is 99%, earning it a Four-Star rating. If this organization aligns with your passions and values, you can give with confidence.

This overall score is calculated from multiple beacon scores, weighted as follows: 35% Accountability & Finance, 44% Impact & Measurement, 9% Leadership & Adaptability, 12% Culture & Community. Learn more about our criteria and methodology.

Historical Ratings

Charity Navigator's ratings previously did not consider Leadership & Adaptability, Culture & Community, or Impact & Measurement. The historic rating mainly reflects a version of today’s Accountability and Finance score. More information on our previous rating methodologies can be found on our rating methodology page.

Date Published	Overall Rating
6/1/2020
3/1/2020
7/1/2019
This organization received multiple star ratings within this fiscal year, due to an update to its Accountability and Transparency data and/or the receipt of an amended Form 990.
12/1/2018
5/1/2017
8/1/2016
6/1/2016
10/1/2015
7/1/2015
10/1/2014
12/1/2013
11/1/2013
10/1/2013
4/1/2013

Total Revenue Amount	Expectation to Receive Credit
$2 million or higher and 40% or higher donor support	Expected to complete an audit and have an audit oversight committee
$1 million or higher	Expected to complete an audit
$500,000 - $1 million	Expected to complete an audit, review, or compilation
Less than $500,000	No expectation (removed from scoring methodology)

Impact & Measurement

Score

100

This beacon estimates the actual impact a charity has on the lives of those it serves, and determines whether it is making good use of donor resources to achieve that impact.

Learn more

Assessments

Impact

100 out of 100 points

100% of Impact & Measurement score

Full Credit

Partial Credit

No Credit

Impact Evaluation

100 out of 100 points

Impact Statement

$559 total costs / $1,803 worth of goods distributed = roughly $0.31 provides a dollar's worth of essential goods to someone in need [2021 USD]

Program Context

Supplies for patients undergoing breast cancer treatment: This program directly distributes goods that fulfill the basic needs of its beneficiaries.

Data Time Period

1/5/23 to 1/5/24

Benchmark for Scoring

Impact scores of goods provision programs are based on comparing the cost to distribute the goods against the market value of those goods. Programs receive an Impact score of 100 if the cost to distribute goods is less than 75% of the value of those goods and a score of 80 if it is less than 125%. If a nonprofit reports impact but doesn't meet the benchmark for cost-effectiveness, it earns a score of 65. This program provides goods for less than 75% the market value of the goods.

Methodology

This impact score was determined through the Goods Provision methodology which is fully detailed in the Charity Navigator Guide to Ratings. Analysis conducted in 2024 by Charity Navigator using data submitted by the nonprofit, theory and evidence from scientific research studies, and public datasets.

Data Source

The nonprofit submitted data on the composition and market value of the goods it distributed.

Measurement

Unscored

0% of Impact & Measurement score

Program Planning and Design

This section assesses the use of crucial evaluation tools in program objective-setting and activities.

Program Development

This section assesses the consideration of stakeholders in program objectives and activities.

Data Collection and Analysis

This section assesses the best practices used in collecting and analyzing program data.

Reporting and Distribution of Results

This section assesses reporting and disseminating program results.

Use of Results

This section assesses the use of results to guide learning.

Equity Data (3/7)
	We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
	We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and/or portfolios.
	We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization/'s programs, portfolios, and the populations served.
	We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
	We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
	We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured
	We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.

Equity Policies & Processes (4/7)
	We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity.
	We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions.
	We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
	We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
	We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
	We measure and then disaggregate job satisfaction and retention data by race, function, level, and/or team.
	We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.