PRIESTS OF THE SACRED HEART

This organization is not rated

Impact & Measurement

Accountability & Finance

Culture & Community

Leadership & Adaptability

PRIESTS OF THE SACRED HEART

Favorite

Profile managed by nonprofit | Is this your nonprofit?

501(c)(3) organization

Donations are tax-deductible

URL not available

7373 S LOVERS LANE RD

FRANKLIN WI 53132-1850

FRANKLIN WI | IRS ruling year: 1946 | EIN: 39-1243521

An EIN is a unique nine-digit number that identifies a business for tax purposes.

Organization Mission

Mission not available

Rating Information

Not currently rated

Ratings are calculated from one or more beacon scores. Currently, we require either an Accountability & Finance beacon or an Impact & Measurement beacon to be eligible for a Charity Navigator rating. Note: The absence of a rating does not indicate a positive or negative assessment; it only indicates that we have not yet evaluated this organization.

See rating report below to learn why this organization is not currently eligible.

Historical Ratings

Charity Navigator's ratings previously did not consider Leadership & Adaptability, Culture & Community, or Impact & Measurement. The historic rating mainly reflects a version of today’s Accountability and Finance score. More information on our previous rating methodologies can be found on our rating methodology page.

Rating histories are available for a growing number of rated organizations. Check back later to see if this organization has a rating history!

Impact & Measurement

Score

78

This beacon estimates the actual impact a charity has on the lives of those it serves, and determines whether it is making good use of donor resources to achieve that impact.

Learn more

Assessments

Impact

Unscored

0% of Impact & Measurement score

Measurement

78 out of 100 points

100% of Impact & Measurement score

Full Credit

Partial Credit

No Credit

The Measuring Outcomes assessment evaluates how well a charity tracks progress towards its mission's outcomes.

Displayed below are the responses provided by the charity for the Measuring Outcomes assessment. Each question is designed to address specific criteria, with responses eligible for full, partial, or no credit. Please refer to the scoring rubric for details on how responses are scored.

Selected program: Seminary Education, Submitted September 2024

Program Planning and Design

24 out of 29 points

This section assesses the use of crucial evaluation tools in program objective-setting and activities.

Charity leadership uses information collected to make decisions regarding programs

Agree, uses information collected to improve programs

Charity staff have training or experience in monitoring and evaluation

Agree, staff have experience working with monitoring and evaluation practices

Charity has documents and reviews how program activities lead to change

Agree, documents and reviews

Charity has researched program model before implementation in the following ways

Referred to the practices of similar nonprofits
Referred to the practices of government programs
Referred to relevant private-sector practices
Surveyed target population

Charity revisits how program activities lead to change

Agree, does revisit how program activities lead to change

Charity tracks program progress in the following ways

Tracks activities
Tracks outcomes and impacts

Program Development

22 out of 26 points

This section assesses the consideration of stakeholders in program objectives and activities.

Charity identifies program target population needs in the following ways

Reviewed data from prior monitoring and/or evaluation
Conducted a literature review
Conducted a needs assessment

Charity considers practical, cultural, and political needs and interests of those served by program

Agree, charity is responsive to practical, cultural, and political needs

Charity reviews the work whether similar organizations work on the same problem

Disagree, does not review the work of similar organizations

Charity uses SMART Goals

Agree, identified Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-Bound (SMART) goals

Data Collection and Analysis

12 out of 18 points

This section assesses the best practices used in collecting and analyzing program data.

Charity tracks program information in the following ways

Collects data before a program is initiated
Collects data during program implementation
Collects data when a program is complete

Charity collects programmatic information on those served by the program in the following ways

Identifies the number of those served by program
Collects demographic data of those served by program
Identifies the number of those successfully served by the program

Charity collects and analyzes program information to determine results in the following ways

Compares results to data from major institutions

Reporting and Distribution of Results

13 out of 18 points

This section assesses reporting and disseminating program results.

Charity reports program results to key stakeholders

Funders
Board members
Other organizations engaged in similar work

Charity reports both favorable and unfavorable results

Yes, charity reports both favorable of unfavorable results

Use of Results

7 out of 9 points

This section assesses the use of results to guide learning.

Charity uses program results to inform future work for the following reasons

Inform strategic planning
Improve program operations
Understand the impact of their work
Inform how we create future programs

Equity Data (4/7)
	We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race.
	We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and/or portfolios.
	We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization/'s programs, portfolios, and the populations served.
	We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support.
	We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders.
	We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured
	We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.

Equity Policies & Processes (5/7)
	We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity.
	We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions.
	We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization.
	We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board.
	We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability.
	We measure and then disaggregate job satisfaction and retention data by race, function, level, and/or team.
	We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization.

Favorite

PRIESTS OF THE SACRED HEART

Rating Information

Not currently rated

Rating Report

Additional Information

78

Assessments

Impact

Unscored

Measurement

78 out of 100 points

93

Assessments

Constituent Feedback

100 out of 100 points

Equity Strategies™

89 out of 100 points

Error attempting donation

You're too fast!

Rating Information

Not currently rated

Rating Report

Additional Information

78

Assessments

Impact

Unscored

Measurement

78 out of 100 points

93

Assessments

Constituent Feedback

100 out of 100 points

Equity Strategies™

89 out of 100 points