ARLINGTON VA | IRS ruling year: 2015 | EIN: 47-2375227
An EIN is a unique nine-digit number that identifies a business for tax purposes.
An EIN is a unique nine-digit number that identifies a business for tax purposes.
Organization Mission
Our mission is to help foster innovative solutions to current and future infrastructure challenges.
Rating Information
Not currently rated
Ratings are calculated from one or more beacon scores. Currently, we require either an Accountability & Finance beacon or an Impact & Measurement beacon to be eligible for a Charity Navigator rating. Note: The absence of a rating does not indicate a positive or negative assessment; it only indicates that we have not yet evaluated this organization.
See rating report below to learn why this organization is not currently eligible.
Historical Ratings
Charity Navigator's ratings previously did not consider Leadership & Adaptability, Culture & Community, or Impact & Measurement. The historic rating mainly reflects a version of today’s Accountability and Finance score. More information on our previous rating methodologies can be found on our rating methodology page.
Rating histories are available for a growing number of rated organizations. Check back later to see if this organization has a rating history!
Public Institute for Facility Safety cannot currently be evaluated by our Accountability & Finance methodology due to only having one year of electronically-filed IRS Form 990 data.
To ensure year-to-year consistency the Encompass Rating System's Accountability & Finance beacon analyzes the three-year average of some data provided through the IRS 990.
Charity Navigator currently only has one year of consecutive e-filed Forms 990 from the IRS for Public Institute for Facility Safety under the EIN: 47-2375227.
Before Charity Navigator can evaluate Public Institute for Facility Safety, Public Institute for Facility Safety will need to e-file for additional fiscal years.
Revenue and expense data is not available for this organization. This data is only available if this organization has at least one year of electronically-filed Form 990 data filed within the last $six years.
Salary of Key Persons - No Data Available
No Data Available
Salary of Key Persons data is currently unavailable for this organization. This data is only available if this charity has at least one year of electronically-filed Form 990 data filed within the last 3 years. In some cases, there may be an electronically-filed 990 on file but the nonprofit may have not included the information and therefore we cannot post it.
IRS Published Data (Business Master File) - Data Available
Organization which receives a substantial part of its support from a governmental unit or the general public 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) (BMF foundation code: 15)
Affiliation:
Independent - the organization is an independent organization or an independent auxiliary (i.e., not affiliated with a National, Regional, or Geographic grouping of organizations). (BMF affiliation code: 3)
Data Sources (IRS Forms 990) - Data Available
The Form 990 is a document that nonprofit organizations file with the IRS annually. We leverage accountability and finance data from it to form Encompass ratings. Click here to search for this organization's Forms 990 on the IRS website (if any are available). Simply enter the organization's name (Public Institute for Facility Safety) or EIN (472375227) in the 'Search Term' field.
Impact & Measurement
Not Currently Scored
Public Institute for Facility Safety cannot currently be evaluated by our Impact & Measurement methodology because either (A) it is eligible, but we have not yet received data; (B) we have not yet developed an algorithm to estimate its programmatic impact; (C) its programs are not direct services; or (D) it is not heavily reliant on contributions from individual donors.
Note: The absence of a score does not indicate a positive or negative assessment, it only indicates that we have not yet evaluated the organization.
Does your organization collect feedback (i.e., perceptions, opinions, concerns) from the people meant to ultimately benefit from your mission?
Yes
Feedback Usage
100 out of 100 points
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify and remedy poor client service experiences
To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences
To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations
To inform the development of new programs/projects
To identify where we are less inclusive across demographic groups
To strengthen relationships with the people we serve
To understand client needs and how we can help them achieve their desired outcomes
Practices
100 out of 100 points
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually
We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people
We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible
We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us
We look for patterns in feedback based on demographics (e.g., race, age, gender, etc.)
We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.)
We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response
We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback
We share the feedback we received with the people we serve
Challenges
100 out of 100 points
What challenges does your organization face in collecting feedback from the people you serve?
It is difficult to get people to respond to requests for feedback
We don’t have the right technology to collect and aggregate feedback efficiently
It is difficult to find the ongoing funding to support feedback collection
It is difficult to identify actionable feedback
Equity Strategies™
85 out of 100 points
67% of Culture & Community score
Full Credit
Partial Credit
No Credit
Equity Strategies™ - Number of Data, Policies & Processes
85 out of 100 points
This organization's score of 85 is a passing score. The organization reported that it is implementing 7 Equity Practices.
The metric is based on the elements of the Equity Strategies™ checklist, developed by Equity in the Center™.
Leadership & Adaptability
Score
100
This beacon provides an assessment of the organization's leadership capacity, strategic thinking and planning, and ability to innovate or respond to changes in constituent demand/need or other relevant social and economic conditions to achieve the organization's mission.
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking through articulating the organization's mission.
Our mission is to help foster innovative solutions to current and future infrastructure challenges.
Vision Statement
10 out of 10 points
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking through articulating the organization's vision.
Our vision is to serve the public and private sectors as the trusted resource for higher standards,
Strategic Goals
20 out of 20 points
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking and goal setting through sharing their most important strategic goals.
Goal One: Improve the quality of research and educational content. This is at the core of what we do and why we do it. Ensuring the best, most accurate research will help advance solutions nationwide.
Goal Two: Expanding team and broadening our institutional knowledge and capacity. This will allow us to conduct more and better quality research and produce higher quality educational content for all audiences.
Goal Three: With sustainable funding and diverse team, we will launch new areas of research that we have identified as needed or sparse in existing literature. This will elevate solutions to known challenges.
Leadership
30 out of 30 points
Full Credit
Partial Credit
No Credit
Investment in Leadership Development
15 out of 15 points
The nonprofit provides evidence of investment in leadership development.
PIFS identifies leadership development resources and conferences and encourages staff and leadership to participate. This includes participation in virtual events and joining networking groups. Additionally, the board of directors and chairman of the board make time to meet with and mentor staff leadership in order to ensure each team member has the resources they need and to stay apprised of the needs and priorities of the organization. Finally, our organization uses a learn-by-doing model with leadership oversight to cultivate leadership skills in all team members. This means that lower level team members receive management projects and tasks like intern oversight or project oversight, which allows them to learn leadership skills by employing them themselves. Leadership then follow up and guides through any issues, as well as checks in when a project is complete to provide feedback, receive feedback, and ensure proper resources are prioritized for that team member.
External Focus on Mobilizing Mission
15 out of 15 points
The nonprofit provides evidence of leadership through focusing externally and mobilizing resources for the mission.
Strategic Partnerships
Thought Leadership
Social Promotion
Adaptability
30 out of 30 points
Full Credit
Partial Credit
No Credit
Adaptability Statement
30 out of 30 points
The nonprofit has an opportunity to tell the story of how the organization adapted to tremendous external changes in the last year.
With the onset of COVID-19, several challenges presented themselves to the organization. These primarily took the form of financial and interpersonal restrictions.
While PIFS already strives to be good stewards of donated resources, by eliminating the need for overhead and leveraging remote work, the limitations presented by COVID-19 made this all the more important. Donations and resources were less robust when the pandemic took effect, with several individuals and groups ceasing donations. Leadership quickly streamlined the budget to ensure that payroll and the core programmatic would not be impacted. This also began to impact the more interpersonal level, by restricting in-person events and meetings.
To spare funds and protect public health, leadership converted all board meetings into virtual gatherings and ensured all meetings and events that could be completed by video conference, call, email , or other digital means were so converted.
Finally, while slimming expenses and interpersonal gatherings, leadership had to ensure that the organizational culture was preserved and that team members had the resources they needed, without being disconnected or strained by the new model.
More frequent check ins with the board, leadership, and team members became the norm. From the last year, a new standard operating procedure was implemented with weekly agenda calls between all team members and monthly organizational forecasting. This new procedure helped ensure that everyone organization-wide knew what to expect in the next week and month, gave a platform and space to voice priorities, needs, concerns, and ideas, and helped make communication more robust.
In the end, this made up for the interpersonal strain caused by fewer in-person events and meetings. It also ensured that the most efficient possible use of resources is instilled in the whole organization as a culture, so that if and when resources are more available, they will not be wasted.