Pullman WA | IRS ruling year: 2016 | EIN: 81-3858018
An EIN is a unique nine-digit number that identifies a business for tax purposes.
An EIN is a unique nine-digit number that identifies a business for tax purposes.
Organization Mission
The Phoenix Conservancy restores endangered ecosystems globally for the communities that depend on them and the conservation of biodiversity.
We are a young, rapi ... (More)
Rating Information
Great
This charity's score is 100%, earning it a Four-Star rating. If this organization aligns with your passions and values, you can give with confidence.
Charity Navigator's ratings previously did not consider Leadership & Adaptability, Culture & Community, or Impact & Measurement. The historic rating mainly reflects a version of today’s Accountability and Finance score. More information on our previous rating methodologies can be found on our rating methodology page.
Rating histories are available for a growing number of rated organizations. Check back later to see if this organization has a rating history!
Phoenix Conservancy cannot currently be evaluated by our Accountability & Finance methodology due to only having one year of electronically-filed IRS Form 990 data.
To ensure year-to-year consistency the Encompass Rating System's Accountability & Finance beacon analyzes the three-year average of some data provided through the IRS 990.
Charity Navigator currently only has one year of consecutive e-filed Forms 990 from the IRS for Phoenix Conservancy under the EIN: 81-3858018.
Before Charity Navigator can evaluate Phoenix Conservancy, Phoenix Conservancy will need to e-file for additional fiscal years.
This chart displays the trend of revenue and expenses over the past several years for this organization, as reported on their IRS Form 990.
Click or hover over the bar to see exact $ amount
Salary of Key Persons - Data Available
Presented here are up to five of this organization's highest compensated employees. This compensation data includes salary, cash bonuses, and expense accounts and is displayed exactly how it is reported to the IRS. The amounts do not include nontaxable benefits, deferred compensation, or other amounts not reported on Form W-2. In some cases, these amounts may include compensation from related organizations. Read the IRS policies for compensation reporting
Cullen Anderson, Madagascar Project Manager
$42,068
Christopher Duke, Executive Director, Board Member
Organization which receives a substantial part of its support from a governmental unit or the general public 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) (BMF foundation code: 15)
Affiliation:
Independent - the organization is an independent organization or an independent auxiliary (i.e., not affiliated with a National, Regional, or Geographic grouping of organizations). (BMF affiliation code: 3)
Data Sources (IRS Forms 990) - Data Available
The Form 990 is a document that nonprofit organizations file with the IRS annually. We leverage accountability and finance data from it to form Encompass ratings. Click here to search for this organization's Forms 990 on the IRS website (if any are available). Simply enter the organization's name (Phoenix Conservancy) or EIN (813858018) in the 'Search Term' field.
Impact & Measurement
Score
100
This beacon estimates the actual impact a charity has on the lives of those it serves, and determines whether it is making good use of donor resources to achieve that impact.
$27,776 total costs / 18 years of personal carbon emissions offset = roughly $1,600 offsets one year of personal carbon emissions for a typical American [2021 USD]
Program Context
Madagascar Rainforest Restoration: This program plants trees to reforest or afforest land in order to sequester carbon to avert greenhouse gas emissions.
Data Time Period
11/1/22 to 11/1/23
Benchmark for Scoring
Impact scores of reforestation and afforestation programs are based on a comparison to the social cost of carbon. The social cost of carbon represents the cost to society of emitting a metric ton of carbon dioxide equivalent greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere. If carbon was efficiently priced in a carbon market, our benchmark of $3888 is approximately what the typical American would pay each year to maintain their current level of emissions, in 2021 USD. Nonprofits score 100 points if they can offset the carbon emissions of a typical American for less than $2916 in 2021 USD. They score 80 points if they can do so for between $2916 (i.e. 75% of the benchmark) and $4860 (i.e. 125% of the benchmark). If a nonprofit reports impact but doesn't meet the benchmark for cost-effectiveness, it earns a score of 65. This program may offset a typical American's personal carbon emissions for less than 75% of the social cost of those emissions.
Methodology
This impact score was determined through the Afforestation & Reforestation methodology which is fully detailed in the Charity Navigator Guide to Ratings. Analysis conducted in 2024 by Charity Navigator using data submitted by the nonprofit, theory and evidence from scientific research studies, and public datasets.
Data Source
The nonprofit submitted data on how many hectares of land it reforested or afforested, as well as general information on the type of land on which the nonprofit planted.
Measurement
Unscored
0% of Impact & Measurement score
Culture & Community
Score
97
This beacon provides an assessment of the organization's culture and connectedness to the community it serves.
Does your organization collect feedback (i.e., perceptions, opinions, concerns) from the people meant to ultimately benefit from your mission?
Yes
Feedback Usage
100 out of 100 points
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify and remedy poor client service experiences
To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences
To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations
To inform the development of new programs/projects
To identify where we are less inclusive across demographic groups
To strengthen relationships with the people we serve
To understand client needs and how we can help them achieve their desired outcomes
Practices
100 out of 100 points
Which of the following feedback practices does your organization routinely carry out?
We collect feedback from the people we serve at least annually
We take steps to get feedback from marginalized or under-represented people
We aim to collect feedback from as many people we serve as possible
We take steps to ensure people feel comfortable being honest with us
We look for patterns in feedback based on people’s interactions with us (e.g., site, frequency of service, etc.)
We engage the people who provide feedback in looking for ways we can improve in response
We tell the people who gave us feedback how we acted on their feedback
Challenges
100 out of 100 points
What challenges does your organization face in collecting feedback from the people you serve?
It is difficult to get people to respond to requests for feedback
It is difficult to find the ongoing funding to support feedback collection
Equity Strategies™
95 out of 100 points
67% of Culture & Community score
Full Credit
Partial Credit
No Credit
Equity Strategies™ - Number of Data, Policies & Processes
95 out of 100 points
This organization's score of 95 is a passing score. The organization reported that it is implementing 12 Equity Practices.
The metric is based on the elements of the Equity Strategies™ checklist, developed by Equity in the Center™.
Leadership & Adaptability
Score
100
This beacon provides an assessment of the organization's leadership capacity, strategic thinking and planning, and ability to innovate or respond to changes in constituent demand/need or other relevant social and economic conditions to achieve the organization's mission.
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking through articulating the organization's mission.
The Phoenix Conservancy restores endangered ecosystems globally for the communities that depend on them and the conservation of biodiversity.
We are a young, rapidly-growing nonprofit based in Pullman, WA working to restore the most critically-endangered, biodiverse ecosystems (10% or less intact) on a Local (Palouse prairie), National (Great Plains prairie), and Global (Madagascar rainforest) scale. In 2025, we are expanding our work to three additional endangered ecosystems around the world (announced in late 2024).
In all of our focal ecosystems, we leverage restoration as a vehicle to combat and reverse:
• Biodiversity loss
• Climate change and resulting insecurity, desertification, and erosion
• Poverty, malnutrition, poor quality of life, and loss of economic empowerment
While these foci may seem unconnected at first glance, ecosystem degradation and human desperation invariably go hand-in-hand; TPC strongly believes that successful restoration depends on addressing causes of human suffering simultaneously. Our innovative, science-driven approach to restoration is built around this perspective, going beyond simply planting trees to craft self-sustaining restoration projects that generate new opportunities to improve lives at every stage.
Vision Statement
10 out of 10 points
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking through articulating the organization's vision.
We envision a world in which all the planet's ecosystems are regenerated and conserved to their maximum extent and their preservation is prioritized by all humans.
Strategic Goals
20 out of 20 points
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking and goal setting through sharing their most important strategic goals.
Goal One: Restore a maximal amount of degraded land into their original ecosystem, prioritizing the most critically endangered, biodiverse ecosystems on local, national, and global geographic scales.
Goal Two: Develop social enterprise programs for communities that rely on the ecosystems where we work; successful ecological restoration depends on addressing root causes of human suffering.
Goal Three: Develop a strong, equitable, enduring, and pragmatic conservation organization through a continual commitment to optimizing all practices for efficiency and longevity.
Leadership
30 out of 30 points
Full Credit
Partial Credit
No Credit
Investment in Leadership Development
15 out of 15 points
The nonprofit provides evidence of investment in leadership development.
True to our long-term perspective, we have invested most strongly in leadership development of the next generation of conservationists by providing paid internships for the first time. In doing so, we seek to make careers in conservation more equitable and accessible to diverse perspectives than in the past by investing now in the leaders that will shape our field in the decades to come.
External Focus on Mobilizing Mission
15 out of 15 points
The nonprofit provides evidence of leadership through focusing externally and mobilizing resources for the mission.
Strategic Partnerships
Collaborative Engagement
Thought Leadership
Social Promotion
Civic Engagement
Adaptability
30 out of 30 points
Full Credit
Partial Credit
No Credit
Adaptability Statement
30 out of 30 points
The nonprofit has an opportunity to tell the story of how the organization adapted to tremendous external changes in the last year.
In response to generally lower salaries associated with nonprofits (especially organizations transitioning to paid positions for the first time), TPC was forced to adapt to several staff transitions due to departures of previous staff members pursuing higher compensation. High turnover is common in conservation, and despite the challenges that hiring poses for a very small staff, embracing unexpected changes as learning opportunities enabled our organization to not only weather these transitions, but to thrive and continue to grow. This funding has allowed us to maintain and hire talented, dedicated staff and interns, as we continue to develop revenue-generating restoration projects and escape the notorious “Nonprofit Starvation Cycle” that threatens so many young organizations.